GitHub[220K]試用 OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10067/10081/10033/10092/100
MiMo-V2.517/10053/10046/10092/10067/10050/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.41/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$2.09/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$0.0028/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
5.5M
474K
Completed sessions
150,016,480
20,550,899
Token share
49.3%
0.98%
Tokens
659T+4,837%
13T-74%
SEP 13NOV 7
SEP 13NOV 7
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.8%522K user-weeks
63.8%14K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.