Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy4

  1. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Kimi K3.1 Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder17/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Hy450/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder53/10092/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.46/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$1.39/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
66K
10K
Completed sessions
173,419
39,519
Token share
0.03%
0.01%
Tokens
387B+100%
181B+100%
SEP 14NOV 8
SEP 14NOV 8
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.6%763 user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.