Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- InklingThinking MachinesHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 70/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Inkling | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 31/100 | 92/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.05/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Output
$0.57/ 1M
$4.05/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.17/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
5.5M
0
Completed sessions
150,187,205
0
Token share
49.3%
0%
Tokens
659T+4,842%
00%
SEP 13NOV 7
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.8%522K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeInkling vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructInkling·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonInkling vs Jamba MiniInkling·Jamba Mini